.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
Introduction: When AI Agents Stop Being Demos and Start Being Infrastructure
For most of the last decade, AI systems were evaluated as isolated artifacts: a model, an API, a product feature. That mental model is now obsolete.
As we move toward 2026, the industry is crossing a structural threshold: AI agents are no longer standalone tools—they are becoming autonomous actors inside distributed systems. They plan, call tools, exchange messages, delegate subtasks, and persist state over time. Once that happens, the question is no longer how smart an agent is, but how safely and predictably it interacts with other agents.
From my perspective as a software engineer and AI researcher with more than five years of production experience, this is the moment where agent interoperability standards become unavoidable. Without shared foundations, multi-agent systems degrade into brittle, non-composable silos—exactly the failure mode that early microservices and distributed systems faced before standard protocols stabilized the ecosystem.
This article examines what I refer to as the AI Agentic Foundation: the emerging technical principles and interoperability standards being shaped—implicitly and explicitly—by organizations such as OpenAI, Anthropic, and Block. This is not a recap of announcements. It is a system-level analysis of why these standards are forming, what problems they are trying to solve, and what breaks if they fail.
Objective Facts: What Is Changing at the System Level
Before analysis, it is important to establish objective ground truths.
Observable Industry Shifts (Facts, Not Opinions)
- AI agents now execute multi-step plans rather than single prompts.
- Agents increasingly call external tools and APIs autonomously.
- Persistent memory and long-running context are becoming default.
- Enterprises are experimenting with multi-agent orchestration, not single-model usage.
- Vendors are converging on similar abstractions: tools, messages, roles, state, and policies.
These facts are visible across platforms from OpenAI, Anthropic, and infrastructure-oriented players such as Block, which approaches agents from a payments, trust, and transactional integrity angle.
The technical implication is straightforward: agents must interact safely, predictably, and composably across organizational and vendor boundaries.
Why “Agentic Interoperability” Is a Hard Engineering Problem
Technically speaking, interoperability between AI agents is significantly harder than API interoperability.
APIs vs AI Agents: A Structural Comparison
| Dimension | Traditional APIs | AI Agents |
|---|---|---|
| Input | Deterministic schema | Probabilistic natural language |
| Output | Predictable responses | Non-deterministic reasoning |
| State | Stateless or explicit | Implicit + persistent |
| Failure Mode | Explicit errors | Silent hallucinations |
| Trust Boundary | Code-defined | Behavior-defined |
From an engineering standpoint, APIs fail loudly. Agents fail quietly. That difference alone introduces systemic risk.
Cause–effect relationship:
As soon as agents communicate with other agents, failure propagation becomes behavioral rather than syntactic. One agent’s hallucination can cascade into another agent’s plan.
.jpg)
The AI Agentic Foundation: Core Principles Emerging Across Vendors
Despite different philosophies, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Block are converging on a set of shared architectural constraints. These are not formal standards yet—but they function as de facto ones.
1. Explicit Role and Capability Declaration
Agents must declare:
- What they can do
- What tools they can invoke
- What domains they are authorized to operate in
This mirrors capability-based security in operating systems.
Professional judgment:
From my perspective as a software engineer, any agent system that does not enforce explicit capability declaration will eventually experience privilege creep and unintended side effects.
2. Structured Message Passing Over Free-Form Prompts
All major platforms are moving away from unstructured prompt chaining toward typed messages and tool calls.
| Approach | System Risk |
|---|---|
| Free-text chaining | High ambiguity |
| Structured messages | Reduced misinterpretation |
| Tool schemas | Enforceable contracts |
Technically speaking, this shift is equivalent to moving from shell scripts to strongly typed interfaces in distributed systems.
3. Deterministic Tool Execution Boundaries
Agents can reason probabilistically—but tools must execute deterministically.
This separation is critical.
| Layer | Acceptable Uncertainty |
|---|---|
| Reasoning | High |
| Planning | Medium |
| Tool Execution | Near-zero |
Cause–effect:
If tool execution is non-deterministic, debugging multi-agent systems becomes practically impossible.
Where OpenAI, Anthropic, and Block Differ Architecturally
While converging on principles, each organization emphasizes different failure domains.
Comparative Architectural Emphasis
| Organization | Core Concern | Architectural Bias |
|---|---|---|
| OpenAI | General-purpose orchestration | Flexibility & scale |
| Anthropic | Safety & alignment | Constraint-first design |
| Block | Trust & transactions | Determinism & auditability |
This diversity is healthy. It mirrors how databases once specialized: some optimized for consistency, others for availability.
.jpg)
System-Level Risks Without Shared Standards
1. Agent Deadlocks and Feedback Loops
Without shared expectations, agents can:
- Repeatedly delegate tasks to each other
- Amplify incorrect assumptions
- Enter non-terminating reasoning loops
Expert judgment:
Technically speaking, this introduces a new class of bugs—behavioral deadlocks—that traditional monitoring tools cannot detect.
2. Security as Emergent Behavior (A Dangerous Pattern)
In agent systems, security is no longer enforced purely by access control lists. It emerges from:
- Prompt interpretation
- Tool usage
- Memory recall
This is inherently fragile.
| Security Model | Predictability |
|---|---|
| Role-based access | High |
| Capability-based | High |
| Prompt-based | Low |
From my perspective, treating prompts as security boundaries is a category error.
3. Vendor Lock-In at the Cognitive Layer
Without interoperability standards, organizations risk lock-in not just at the API level—but at the reasoning pattern level.
Once workflows are encoded as agent behaviors, migration costs increase dramatically.
What Improves If Agentic Foundations Succeed
Positive Outcomes
- Cross-vendor agent collaboration
- Auditable decision pipelines
- Safer autonomous execution
- Reusable agent components
Who Benefits Technically
- Engineers: Can reason about failure modes
- Architects: Can design composable agent systems
- Enterprises: Can govern AI behavior systematically
What Breaks If They Fail
If interoperability standards fail to emerge:
- Agent ecosystems fragment
- Enterprises restrict autonomy
- Innovation slows due to risk aversion
- Regulation fills the vacuum with blunt constraints
Professional accountability statement:
Based on my engineering experience, fragmented agent ecosystems will lead to a repeat of the early microservices chaos—only harder to debug and more expensive to unwind.
Long-Term Industry Implications (2026–2030)
Agents Become Infrastructure, Not Features
Just as databases and operating systems stabilized around shared abstractions, AI agents will require:
- Standard messaging protocols
- Shared capability vocabularies
- Formal verification at tool boundaries
This is not optional. It is a prerequisite for scale.
Final Expert Perspective
From my perspective as a software engineer and AI researcher, the AI Agentic Foundation is not about making agents smarter. It is about making them compatible, governable, and trustworthy.
The organizations shaping these standards today are not merely shipping products—they are defining the rules of interaction for autonomous systems. Those rules will determine whether agentic AI becomes a stable layer of modern software—or an unmanageable source of systemic risk.
The most important question for 2025 is no longer what can AI agents do?
It is:
Under what shared constraints can they safely do it together?
References
- OpenAI Documentation — https://openai.com
- Anthropic Research — https://www.anthropic.com
- Block Engineering Blog — https://engineering.block.xyz
- NIST AI Risk Management Framework — https://www.nist.gov/ai
- ACM Queue: Autonomous Systems — https://queue.acm.org