.jpg){kind=small}
Why Your AI Model Outputs Differ Even at Temperature $0$: The Hidden Problem of Batch Invariance
Target Audience: AI Researchers, Machine Learning Engineers, Critical Application Developers (Finance, Medical, Legal), Infrastructure Providers.
SEO Focus: LLM Non-Determinism, Temperature 0 Inconsistency, Batch Invariance, Reproducible AI, GPU Kernel Design, Floating Point Errors, Critical AI Applications.
Tone: Technical, Investigative, Critical, Urgent Call-to-Action.
The Temperature $0$ Myth: When Determinism Fails
The common assumption among AI practitioners is that setting the temperature parameter to $0$ in a Large Language Model (LLM) should guarantee deterministic, identical outputs for identical inputs. When inconsistency occurs, the usual culprit cited is a combination of:
Parallel processing on GPUs.
Floating-point accumulation errors.
However, recent, critical research from Thinking Machines Lab suggests this hypothesis is fundamentally incomplete. Their findings show that on isolated servers, models often are reliable and reproducible. The issue—the non-determinism—actually surfaces when a single server is leveraged to serve multiple users simultaneously by aggregating their requests into a batch.
The Real Culprit: Batch Invariance Failure
The core problem, according to the research, is the lack of Batch Invariance.
When the size and composition of these aggregated batches change from one user request to the next, the underlying GPU kernel code dynamically alters its execution plan. This change affects how computationally intensive operations—such as reductions (like RMSNorm), matrix multiplication, and attention mechanisms—are performed.
This alteration in the execution plan leads to a change in the sequence of summation and truncation. The result? Small, inevitable numerical differences are generated, which cascade through the model’s millions of parameters, ultimately leading to non-identical outputs even when the input (and temperature) remains constant.
In essence, the shape of the query batch dictates the computation path, breaking the "Same Input, Same Output" promise.
The Proposed Solution and Its Cost: Batch-Invariant Kernels
The solution proposed by the researchers is a fundamental rewrite of the computational bedrock: Batch-Invariant Kernels.
This approach involves redesigning the computation kernels so that their results are constant and independent of the batch's shape or size. Achieving this consistency ensures the desired outcome: "Same Input $\rightarrow$ Same Output" across hundreds or thousands of iterations.
However, this consistency comes with a trade-off: a performance penalty. The pursuit of verifiable reliability necessitates a slight reduction in speed compared to the current, non-deterministic methods that prioritize optimization.
Call to Action: The Need for Infrastructure Reliability
The conclusion is clear: this is not a problem that individual developers can fix through clever prompting or code hacks. The architecture itself must change.
For AI to be trusted in critical-use cases—such as legal counsel, medical diagnostics, or financial modeling—verifiable reliability is paramount. Therefore, pressure must be applied to the major infrastructure providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Grok, Microsoft Azure, Google Cloud, etc.) to adopt batch-invariant designs within their serving systems.
Reliability in critical applications should not be a gamble. The integrity of AI outputs depends on it.
Read the Full Paper for the Technical Deep Dive: https://thinkingmachines.ai/blog/defeating-nondeterminism-in-llm-inference/?fbclid=IwY2xjawNeHVtleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFPSzVyQVNYU0ZocXY1VTJVAR5HhrRM2wVjwejpwkIdCPxJoypFptm88sXLMMSPFPBW5AiYERxl-JEA9ASORA_aem_XVeq2MUUEqtKieJKAspsYg